Ovarian Cancer Research - Symptoms, Causes, Treatment, Information

Ovarian Cancer Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Ovarian Cancer, including details on symptoms, causes, treatment, information.


Ovarian Cancer Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Ovarian Cancer

Books on Ovarian Cancer

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



An early signal of CA-125 progression for ovarian cancer patients receiving maintenance treatment after complete clinical response to primary therapy.

Liu PY, Alberts DS, Monk BJ, Brady M, Moon J, Markman M

Southwest Oncology Group Statistical Center, Seattle, WA, USA. pubs@swog.org

PURPOSE: For ovarian cancer patients receiving maintenance treatment after complete clinical response to primary therapy, we tested the predictive value of the following early signal of progressive disease (EPD) criterion based on serum CA-125: for patients with CA-125 nadir <or= 10 U/mL, a confirmed value of >or= 20 U/mL serves as an early signal of CA-125 progression; for patients with nadir more than 10 U/mL, a value >or= 2x nadir that is confirmed predicts progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS The EPD criterion was tested on Southwest Oncology Group trial 9701/Gynecologic Oncology Group trial 178 patients (n = 288) and compared with Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup criterion. RESULTS: For 204 patients with known progressive disease, the progression date was predated by EPD by <or= 60 days in 31%, 61 to 180 days in 15%, and more than 180 days in 10% (median, 56 days early). Of 84 progression-free patients, nine EPDs were found. Overall, 135 patients met the EPD criterion. True disease progression status was undeterminable for two patients and nine were potentially false signals, for a conservative positive predictive value of 93% (95% CI, 88% to 97%). CONCLUSION: Initial testing of the proposed CA-125 criterion resulted in a low false-positive rate and early prediction of disease progression in more than 50% of the patients tested. The proposed criterion may better reflect the timing of disease progression and should be investigated further.

Published 20 August 2007 in J Clin Oncol, 25(24): 3615-20.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Ovarian Cancer Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Ovarian Cancer Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (August)
  Issue 2 (September)
  Issue 3 (October)
  Issue 4 (November)
  Issue 5 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)



Ovarian Cancer Books

100 Q&A About Ovarian Cancer

100 Q&A About Ovarian Cancer